The Transition from Rostro-Carinate Flint Implements to the Tongue-Shaped Implements of River-Terrace Gravels . L. 17. Car,L. R. Car. Post. L. R. Lankester, suggests the name Batiform. Thus it seems that in the earlypalaeolithic period two methods of implement making were in vogue, both intimatelyrelated to the manner in which the rostro-carinates were fashioned. The author hasascertained by experiment that the implements exhibiting a triangular section aremore easily made than those of which the section is rhomboidal.] TO THE TONGUE-SHAPED IMPLEMENTS OF EIVEE-TEEEACE GEAVELS. 34
The Transition from Rostro-Carinate Flint Implements to the Tongue-Shaped Implements of River-Terrace Gravels . L. 17. Car,L. R. Car. Post. L. R. Lankester, suggests the name Batiform. Thus it seems that in the earlypalaeolithic period two methods of implement making were in vogue, both intimatelyrelated to the manner in which the rostro-carinates were fashioned. The author hasascertained by experiment that the implements exhibiting a triangular section aremore easily made than those of which the section is rhomboidal.] TO THE TONGUE-SHAPED IMPLEMENTS OF EIVEE-TEEEACE GEAVELS. 349 DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. All Plates are reproduced from accurate drawings executed by Mr. LeonardSquirrell of Ipswich. The size of the figures on the Plates compared with theimplements themselves is stated for each Plate. Four views of each implement aregiven as well as outline sections. [Note.—All the specimens figured in the Plates, and in text-figs. 15 and 16, havebeen presented to the Department of British and Mediaeval Antiquities andEthnography of the British Museum, Bloomsbury.] Plate 51. (Actual size.) Specimen recovered from
Size: 1230px × 2030px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1920, bookidphiltrans003, bookyear1920
