. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. r^wr-jtwr^r;:^ i^^n'VjTT^i r'^rr'T'»(l?r''7'^^ -T ^^' I «-*^^'W r.^'Tf:^'^?^^ w y-w!j^^*»i^ir V;'« J-'»«i?>«(fJ'.<ltiillJ« f(^^'»,S^'.MWVff¥JWS|r.«WmV* ?"? WJlCT^«!|iWir*?^-*?'^'f? *v'l~«i'n*^!.*T-*''Pl,fW; »VPUK^IIIfian' 22 The Florists^ Review OCTOBKB 7, isfetion ^nd 1^5^ Becision LICENSE FOE FLOWER VENDERS. A test case, relative to Street and doorway flower peddlers operatiiig with- out a state license, was blrought into court August 10 at Lynn, Mass. An itinerant vender of flowers, Harry Fein- zig, of Boston, was ar
. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. r^wr-jtwr^r;:^ i^^n'VjTT^i r'^rr'T'»(l?r''7'^^ -T ^^' I «-*^^'W r.^'Tf:^'^?^^ w y-w!j^^*»i^ir V;'« J-'»«i?>«(fJ'.<ltiillJ« f(^^'»,S^'.MWVff¥JWS|r.«WmV* ?"? WJlCT^«!|iWir*?^-*?'^'f? *v'l~«i'n*^!.*T-*''Pl,fW; »VPUK^IIIfian' 22 The Florists^ Review OCTOBKB 7, isfetion ^nd 1^5^ Becision LICENSE FOE FLOWER VENDERS. A test case, relative to Street and doorway flower peddlers operatiiig with- out a state license, was blrought into court August 10 at Lynn, Mass. An itinerant vender of flowers, Harry Fein- zig, of Boston, was arrested by the board of control, which was desirous of securing a ruling on this matter. H. Feinzig was prosecuted and found guilty of violating the laws regulating itinerant venders. He was not fined, but his conviction is intended to stand as a warning to others who set up tem- porary flower stands for the sale of flowers. Since early spring many persons have set up street and doorway stands and sold flowers. The florists of Lynn con- tended that this business was of a tem- porary and transient nature, and re- quired a state license. They carried their complaints to the board of con- trol, and secured the ruling in this test case, which, it is expected, will free the trade from competition of this kind. INJURY TO STOCK BY FUMES. The Louisiana Supreme court has recognized the right of a florist or nurs- eryman to recover damages for injury to growing stock caused by fumes emitted from nearby factories. In the case in which the decision was handed down, the court affirmed a judgment in favor of a florist for the destruction of his plants by fumes which the wind had blown from the defendant's fer- tilizer factory. It was found that the florist sustained his right to recover damages by showing that at the time his plants were destroyed, the defend- ant's factory was freely emitting fumes, gases and acids, which were capable of destroying plant life, and that the wind
Size: 1732px × 1443px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecad, booksubjectfloriculture, bookyear1912
