. Control of the coyote in California. Bulletin 320 CONTROL OF THE COYOTE IN CALIFORNIA 395 when the boiuity is paid. This system would protect all counties against paying two bounties on the same skin, and it would leave the skin Fig. 7.—Map showing bounties on eoyot«s offered by counties in California. December 1, 1919. Counties which pay bounties are shaded. Figures indicate amount in dollars of bounty paid per coyote. Note wide range of bounty: $ in Mono County to $ in Sonoma County. The bounty system is, at best, well-nigh futile; this is well illus- trated by the coyote
. Control of the coyote in California. Bulletin 320 CONTROL OF THE COYOTE IN CALIFORNIA 395 when the boiuity is paid. This system would protect all counties against paying two bounties on the same skin, and it would leave the skin Fig. 7.—Map showing bounties on eoyot«s offered by counties in California. December 1, 1919. Counties which pay bounties are shaded. Figures indicate amount in dollars of bounty paid per coyote. Note wide range of bounty: $ in Mono County to $ in Sonoma County. The bounty system is, at best, well-nigh futile; this is well illus- trated by the coyote act of our own state, which went into effect March 31, 1891, and was suspended September 30, 1892, after $187,485- had been expended and little had been accomplished. It 2 T. S. Palmer, Yearbook U. S. Dept. Agric. for 1896, p. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original Dixon, Joseph (Joseph Scattergood), 1884-.
Size: 1474px × 1695px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookcollectionbiod, bookdecade1920, bookyear1920
