. Chestnut blight. Chestnut blight; Chestnut. 634 Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 34, No. 7 such as species, size, and position of each tree in the forest canopy, were recorded at each periodic examination. To determine the effect of a reproduction cutting made in 1902, plots 321 and 323 were estabhshed in 1906 in a 45-year-old stand of second-growth hardwoods on the Maltbv tract. All the chestnut. on these plots was cut and salvaged in 1913. Plot 474 was laid out ui 1910 in a 45-year-old stand on the Whittemore estate. A heavy thmning ("C" grade) was made the same year. In 191
. Chestnut blight. Chestnut blight; Chestnut. 634 Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 34, No. 7 such as species, size, and position of each tree in the forest canopy, were recorded at each periodic examination. To determine the effect of a reproduction cutting made in 1902, plots 321 and 323 were estabhshed in 1906 in a 45-year-old stand of second-growth hardwoods on the Maltbv tract. All the chestnut. on these plots was cut and salvaged in 1913. Plot 474 was laid out ui 1910 in a 45-year-old stand on the Whittemore estate. A heavy thmning ("C" grade) was made the same year. In 1915 an im- provement cutting was made, taking out about 1 cord per acre. In this cutting, all of the dead and suppressed trees, most of the mtcrmediate trees, and some of the codominant trees—those crowded. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original 1906-1960
Size: 1366px × 1830px
Photo credit: © Central Historic Books / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcolle, bookcollectionbiodiversity, booksubjectchestnutblight
