[Publications] . rs were unknown in 1589, as Mr. Watts has recently proved in his Letterto Mr. Panizzi ;V the relics in the British Museum, purporting to be newspapers of theyear 1588, being merely forgeries. Lord Ellesmeres brother Brereton was hisbrother-in-law, and was a candidate for some office connected with the musters.] To my assured lovinge frende Thomas Egerton, esquire, herMaties Solicitor generall. Sir. I doe verie thankefullie accepte your late kynde lettersand Frenche occurrences thereinclosed, desireinge still that where-soever you become, I maye, at your conveniente leasure, re
[Publications] . rs were unknown in 1589, as Mr. Watts has recently proved in his Letterto Mr. Panizzi ;V the relics in the British Museum, purporting to be newspapers of theyear 1588, being merely forgeries. Lord Ellesmeres brother Brereton was hisbrother-in-law, and was a candidate for some office connected with the musters.] To my assured lovinge frende Thomas Egerton, esquire, herMaties Solicitor generall. Sir. I doe verie thankefullie accepte your late kynde lettersand Frenche occurrences thereinclosed, desireinge still that where-soever you become, I maye, at your conveniente leasure, receyvesome lynes from yow. For your brother Brereton, his muster,I will, uppon his repaire to me, proceede with Sherington as shallapperteigne and contente you bothe; and accordinglie, by my let-ters to their Lordshipps (which I will inclose in a fewe lynes toyow) certifie the cowrse I helde. And soe, with my hartieste com-mendations, doe, with all my harte, weshe you well. Rocksavage,this xjth of September, 132 THE EGERTON PAPERS. ALL SOULS COLLEGE, OXFORD. [This is the second letter from Secretary Walsingham respecting Stanton Harcourt(vide p. 117 of this Collection). Although an interval of more than three years hadoccurred between the two letters to the Solicitor General, the wording is extremelysimilar. It seems likely that the first communication was not effectual for its pur-pose, and that, for some unexplained cause, the matter was postponed. There is amaterial difference in Lord Ellesmeres indorsements of the two letters, that printedbelow specifying that it was only for parcell of the parsonage, while both letters ofSecretary Walsingham speak as of the parsonage of Stanton Harcourt.] Indorsed, by Lord Ellesmere, 27 Octbris, 158i).. Mr. Secretaryes letter for Al-soules Colledge, for parcell of the personage of Stanton Harcourt. To the right worshipfull my verie loving frend Mr. ThomasEgerton, her Matics Sollicitor Genu. Sir. Her Matie being gratiously pleased to
Size: 2071px × 1206px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1840, bookidp, booksubjectgreatbritain
