The Passaic flood of 1903 . )ooii mlculatedaccordino- to coefficients used for the same dam in Wator-SiipplyPaper No. 88. Recorded gage heights show that over the main damthere was a maximum depth of feet, which continued from 2 to8 p. m., on October 10, representing a niaxinuun flow of 31,f)75 cubicfeet per second. (See PI. I, A.) In the following tal)le is set forth theflow of the river over Beatties dam during the flood, and for purposesof comparison, the figures for the flood ])oriod of March, 1902. Itshould be borne in mind in consulting this tal)lc, that in the case ofthe flood of
The Passaic flood of 1903 . )ooii mlculatedaccordino- to coefficients used for the same dam in Wator-SiipplyPaper No. 88. Recorded gage heights show that over the main damthere was a maximum depth of feet, which continued from 2 to8 p. m., on October 10, representing a niaxinuun flow of 31,f)75 cubicfeet per second. (See PI. I, A.) In the following tal)le is set forth theflow of the river over Beatties dam during the flood, and for purposesof comparison, the figures for the flood ])oriod of March, 1902. Itshould be borne in mind in consulting this tal)lc, that in the case ofthe flood of 1903 exact dates and hours are given, while the figures forthe 1902 flood represent flow determinations at six-hour intervals,beuinninir with the initial rise of that flood. li«MMI0«Mli. .1. BEATTIE-S DAM, LITTLE FALLS, N. J., IN FLOOD.
Size: 2145px × 1165px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookpublisherwashi, bookyear1904
