. Railway mechanical engineer . \ : ;::;:;;:;;# S :::::: j|jP||||^|-fp j^ : 1 ■ 1 -J : ; •- 10- ::::is^s^.::^ t jj ml: :::::;£f:::::::::::::::::::::: £ Q ?-^(-----# —?s o ^ - \\\\[\\\o-3oWr g ^rmm *V : - u\t\\ t frff ^i; ■/ rii?■ \f° - : ]l; m / WfH- : fimf^ 0 . ::_ iii-:\-- ■ ^- r 1 4r^^;fi f^Wmffft^^ $ : ^■-^^t1# *i;i=^^^^^;;;;;;;;:::; s: 11 rrti 1™ «^ 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 ht-t 1 t —+-+fF - - =t=F 1- : Staybolt No. 1 Top Row Front—Lake Shore & Michigan SouthernLocomotive much less than the vertical, indicating an approach to a neu-tral zone, but, as at staybolt No. 1, we find the horizo
. Railway mechanical engineer . \ : ;::;:;;:;;# S :::::: j|jP||||^|-fp j^ : 1 ■ 1 -J : ; •- 10- ::::is^s^.::^ t jj ml: :::::;£f:::::::::::::::::::::: £ Q ?-^(-----# —?s o ^ - \\\\[\\\o-3oWr g ^rmm *V : - u\t\\ t frff ^i; ■/ rii?■ \f° - : ]l; m / WfH- : fimf^ 0 . ::_ iii-:\-- ■ ^- r 1 4r^^;fi f^Wmffft^^ $ : ^■-^^t1# *i;i=^^^^^;;;;;;;;:::; s: 11 rrti 1™ «^ 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 ht-t 1 t —+-+fF - - =t=F 1- : Staybolt No. 1 Top Row Front—Lake Shore & Michigan SouthernLocomotive much less than the vertical, indicating an approach to a neu-tral zone, but, as at staybolt No. 1, we find the horizontalmovement of the sheet to be something more than twice asmuch on the flexible as on the rigidly stayed boiler. It is impossible to state positively that there is no neutral SOLID LIME • MOVEMENT IN BOILER iVITH FIEXIBLE STAYBOLTSDOTTED - ■■ ... .. RtaiD MAX/nUM DEFLECTION FLEXIBLE , , RIGIO . 03 IN. PLAIN PRESSUREFIGURES WITH SyiBOLS - TIMEAFTER LIGHTING FIRE. MOVEMENT IN 001 INCH. Staybolt No. 2 Top Row Center—Lake Shore & Michigan SouthernLocomotive of the top row and close to the back liead, there was a suddenand rapid movement of the inner sheet to the rear on bothrigidly and flexibly stayed boilers, and the maximum ofthe horizontal movement was reached in a very short timeafter the kindling of the fire; the rigidly stayed boiler reach-ing it in 10 and the flexibly stayed in 20 minutes. Without going into details of the other tests, it may bestated that while the amount of movement varied, the char-acter of the motion did not vary essentially and the samerelationship between the rigidly and the flexibly stayedboilers was maintained. When tests were made at the next to the bottom row ofstaybolts, however, a matter developed that proved to beof very great importance. Attention has already been calledto the fact that in the test at staybolt No. 1, the first appar-ent motion of the sheet was downward, but as th
Size: 1451px × 1723px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjectrailroadengineering
