. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187. uviuin; of the recent fonation,speaking of the Sixteenth street And the Sixteenth Street wells did not feel the fulleffect of the replenisiiin{j of the basin for some ticie afterthe rainfall, did theyyA Mo, tliey fe] o ten-norarj- effects fror; the acceesion toUie plane by rainiall near oi e wells avicl Rtrear^is rhich raif^tpaus near the location of the wells, i)ut tlio peraa/ient ef-fect has been growing- ther
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187. uviuin; of the recent fonation,speaking of the Sixteenth street And the Sixteenth Street wells did not feel the fulleffect of the replenisiiin{j of the basin for some ticie afterthe rainfall, did theyyA Mo, tliey fe] o ten-norarj- effects fror; the acceesion toUie plane by rainiall near oi e wells avicl Rtrear^is rhich raif^tpaus near the location of the wells, i)ut tlio peraa/ient ef-fect has been growing- there and has been slower in reacliingthe wells than it hiao tho JucanonGa n!-)riii£;:B; in fact, therise of tho Sixteenth Ltroet wells this year is not anynif:;)ier than it v/as last year, wtdle tlie Cncamonea Springsare flowin,- muc/i more v?ater than they were l-^ist year, nearlydouble, BO it sesjns that the effect tho iaas CucainongjaGprings has been more rapid durin/- the past year than it1ms been at the T7cll8 on Jixtsenth „ :;on*t you find the greater rise in elevation of waterat the lower levels — that is, lower down tlie gradt?A Pro^ortionateV. A \ihy I usually in the s«ne waterplane that the re-verse ic correct, , that tho /^Treater rise occurs near Vne foothillBi wtiere the feed or 3\iy>-ly ic coming in, as distin^Tiished from the lower In ax^ressinc your opinion that there is no contact in the way of coi namication between the modem and ancient al«» luviuji except near the foot of the mountains, do you uase that conclusion wholly upon the observation of the flow of water or upon geological deduction, or both/ii I iiave taken everything into account; ooth the flo;? of wat^r and the behavior of the watemlane, as well as the structural conditions of tho ^ I understood /ou to say some days a^) that there had been no borin/^ or excavations in the odem alluvium north pf tlio .led idilB Which hau penetrated to the an
Size: 1298px × 1926px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto07cuca
