Bacon is Shake-speare . Page 84. Page 103. Page 113- Page 134- Page 144. Page 161. Plate II. Portrait of Francis Bacon. By Van by W. C. Plate II. Portrait of Francis Pacon. By Van by W. C. Edwards. Bacon is Shakespeare. CHAPTER I. What does it matter whether the immortal works werewritten by Shakespeare (of Stratford) or by anotherman who bore (or assumed) the same name? Some twenty years ago, when this question was first propounded, it was deemed an excellent joke, and I find that there still are a great number of persons who seem unable to perceive tha
Bacon is Shake-speare . Page 84. Page 103. Page 113- Page 134- Page 144. Page 161. Plate II. Portrait of Francis Bacon. By Van by W. C. Plate II. Portrait of Francis Pacon. By Van by W. C. Edwards. Bacon is Shakespeare. CHAPTER I. What does it matter whether the immortal works werewritten by Shakespeare (of Stratford) or by anotherman who bore (or assumed) the same name? Some twenty years ago, when this question was first propounded, it was deemed an excellent joke, and I find that there still are a great number of persons who seem unable to perceive that the question is one of considerable importance. When the Shakespeare revival came, some eighty or ninety years ago, people said pretty well for Shakespeare and the learned men of that period were rather ashamed that Shakespeare should be deemed to be the English poet. Three poets in three distant ages born, Greece, Italy and England did adorn, The force of Nature could no further go, To make a third she joined the other two. Dryden did not write these lines in reference to Shake-speare but to Milton. Where will you find the personwho to-day thinks Milt
Size: 1417px × 1764px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjectshakespearewilliam15
