The elastic properties of concrete under bi-axial loading . IV. SUliLZAHY OP CONCLUSIONS. .,,, Perinisslble 3trenr-:th for LftKip^ the design of reinfo-**-ced concrete struc-Lures in r;liich the concrete is bi-axiallyloaded, the same working stresses may be permitted as are ordina-^-ily allov7ed for simple loading. V/liile the Trorkins stresses maybe as great, it must not be forcotten that an accurate computa-tion of the external forces is implied and if these are notdefinitely Xnown the working stress must be reduced. A greaterworlcing stress for bi-axially loaded concrete should not


The elastic properties of concrete under bi-axial loading . IV. SUliLZAHY OP CONCLUSIONS. .,,, Perinisslble 3trenr-:th for LftKip^ the design of reinfo-**-ced concrete struc-Lures in r;liich the concrete is bi-axiallyloaded, the same working stresses may be permitted as are ordina-^-ily allov7ed for simple loading. V/liile the Trorkins stresses maybe as great, it must not be forcotten that an accurate computa-tion of the external forces is implied and if these are notdefinitely Xnown the working stress must be reduced. A greaterworlcing stress for bi-axially loaded concrete should not bepermitted. A statement that, in a bi-axially loaded structure, one loadstrengthens the material agair-st forces in a perpendiculardirection is not true. The deformation is reduced it is true,but these tests show that the strer^th is not increased. In amaterial whose tensile and compressive strengths -ere morenearly equal than in concrete, the strer^gth might be increasedby bi-axial loading, but it may be concluded from these teststhat not the c


Size: 1371px × 1822px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjecttheses, bookyear1912