. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . )urt, ,m6 there was alfjidfu and Rome fcrain •?m(\ BO on, in the ]iortion of that tract. n, Vqv yvRjoh in idfalfu?. A. I coulrin»t tell you; btttweon 10 and »X) ttcr«B. 0. And tho retil/ of it in f^ain? A. Tot all tJio roBt, (). ¥/iiatt portion of tho whole cultivatod imtl wae m ^.rain* A. I tliink there wfttB no; o in grain than there* in any- thinfr else. 0, ?i^jm^t liibr© T^iore in grain thim eY«r;
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . )urt, ,m6 there was alfjidfu and Rome fcrain •?m(\ BO on, in the ]iortion of that tract. n, Vqv yvRjoh in idfalfu?. A. I coulrin»t tell you; btttweon 10 and »X) ttcr«B. 0. And tho retil/ of it in f^ain? A. Tot all tJio roBt, (). ¥/iiatt portion of tho whole cultivatod imtl wae m ^.rain* A. I tliink there wfttB no; o in grain than there* in any- thinfr else. 0, ?i^jm^t liibr© T^iore in grain thim eY«r;,thinr.; elee A. I sli^ld .iud^« eo. 0, Tliat thoy die not irrigate? A. Ho, Rir. Q. Tli« idfulfa botween 10 wict 50 acrtia thoy did irri^^iate? A. Yojij t^ortJ waa Ohmece gai*dt?n find onjnge treos, Q, Fow imich Chinefi« f^arden? 1^, TTjjod to he quite a (hineee gurdon; 15 or 20 ivcreoj (jiiite a l?ir( A. Tlicre waB an orijj:igc orcliiird thore, (). Hcv r:Tuch? A. Oh, acres, jiera4)E; in that nwie^h b- rhood. Q. Miat tauc? A. There ie vineytad on the proi)earty; vineyard now, 0, ^OTf many craa? A. I dont know,to he exiict tbout it b(3cautie I have not over • eaeured it, except to cjJLmilate tJie li^nd tiiat was un- d«r tl\« ditch; they utiliijed
Size: 1289px × 1940px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca
