Purdue debris . olics, giving them the small end of the score (8 to 4).We next journeyed down to Bloomington where we put itover the Pride of Indiana (?) in one of the best games of theseason. It was not a chance of luck one way or the other,neither was it entirely a pitchers battle, but it was a fight bythe whole team in concert. Rice certainly pitched a good gameand displayed his stamina by holding up well to the end of thegame. Purdue. 4; Indiana, 3. We lost to the Little Giants at Crawfordsville (7 to 3).The game was a poor exhibition of ball all around, being repletewith errors and poor b


Purdue debris . olics, giving them the small end of the score (8 to 4).We next journeyed down to Bloomington where we put itover the Pride of Indiana (?) in one of the best games of theseason. It was not a chance of luck one way or the other,neither was it entirely a pitchers battle, but it was a fight bythe whole team in concert. Rice certainly pitched a good gameand displayed his stamina by holding up well to the end of thegame. Purdue. 4; Indiana, 3. We lost to the Little Giants at Crawfordsville (7 to 3).The game was a poor exhibition of ball all around, being repletewith errors and poor batting on both sides. Indiana playedour last game on Stuart Field and carried off the large end ofthe score (3 to 1). The losing of the last two games was dueto a great extent to the absence from the team of Kelly, whohad played a consistent game at third all season, and who, atthis time, sustained a bad sprain in the hurdles. In this, theteam sustained a great loss and was handicapped the rmainderof the Records 1906 WabashNebraska ..Notre DameNotre DameIndianaIndianaWabash Purdue 3 Purdue 3 Purdue 2 Purdue 8 Purdue 4 Purdue 1


Size: 1327px × 1883px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, booksubjectuniversitiesandcolle