. Bonner zoologische Monographien. Zoology. Fig. 4. Hemipenis of C. calyptratus, sulcal view. Chamaeleo chamaeleon orientalis Parker, 1938 BM 1963-805 Rada, Yemen The hemipenes of this subspecies fit the description of the hemipenes of the nominal form (Klaver 1981 a) except for 1) the more prominent development of the smallest rotulae of the sulcal rotulae groups and 2) the more sickle-shaped form of the asulcal rotulae. Chamaeleo arabicus Matschie, 1893 ZMB 11135 (holotype) Lahej near Aden, South Yemen; NHMW 7466:1 same locality Hemipenis with only four elongate rotulae with finely denticula
. Bonner zoologische Monographien. Zoology. Fig. 4. Hemipenis of C. calyptratus, sulcal view. Chamaeleo chamaeleon orientalis Parker, 1938 BM 1963-805 Rada, Yemen The hemipenes of this subspecies fit the description of the hemipenes of the nominal form (Klaver 1981 a) except for 1) the more prominent development of the smallest rotulae of the sulcal rotulae groups and 2) the more sickle-shaped form of the asulcal rotulae. Chamaeleo arabicus Matschie, 1893 ZMB 11135 (holotype) Lahej near Aden, South Yemen; NHMW 7466:1 same locality Hemipenis with only four elongate rotulae with finely denticulated margins. Calyces deep with serrated margins. This hemipenis ornamentation differs clearly from the one of C. chamaeleon (cf. Klaver 1981 a) of which C. arabicus was considered a subspecific. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original Bonn, Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig
Size: 1279px × 1954px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookcollectionbiodiversity, booksubjectzoology
