. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. JURY TRIAL^CMiHntMd. tory to Um* Axtnnt that no eomcl Jndjttnent conM be randanKl tharaon for nrt twlow, .to pnWfied anew to a proper deOnitlon of facto, for aubmiaHion to a Jury to be aummoned by a vmirt df jfovo. MelMsUan <fr Accident fnturancr CV). qf , 39. t ââ New definition of faet» ordertil.] The condition of an accident policy, in favor of bemberay a «rm of ifc/* «t Cb., waa:" l'roTic|e«l that " on eltherof the above n«med tnnmbeni (i%dtHng the mid firm, â " thia fha
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. JURY TRIAL^CMiHntMd. tory to Um* Axtnnt that no eomcl Jndjttnent conM be randanKl tharaon for nrt twlow, .to pnWfied anew to a proper deOnitlon of facto, for aubmiaHion to a Jury to be aummoned by a vmirt df jfovo. MelMsUan <fr Accident fnturancr CV). qf , 39. t ââ New definition of faet» ordertil.] The condition of an accident policy, in favor of bemberay a «rm of ifc/* «t Cb., waa:" l'roTic|e«l that " on eltherof the above n«med tnnmbeni (i%dtHng the mid firm, â " thia fhauranoe aliall coaiio on his |ienion, ; Tlie Jury wore aaiF«d: "3. Wera McL. A Co. dinaolvrd on or about tlie 10th ^ April?" to which they anawered, " K«; but/.W. J* had ^ contlnned and active intereai in the ; "4. Did McIj. Co. in that month publicly a«." " 6. W4a /. S. MeJj. a member of McL. A Co. on thct 18th November?" ( date of h|8 death by droAwninn). To which they anitVered, " No, but had,an intereat in proflta ; HMJ{2) that inaamuch aa the jury were not aal(ed> and-t^ld not atifte, in the precise worda of the condition, whether /. A". MeL. hd\ '\^t the firm " on the 18th Novembeft-, i^d their anawera weWtnaufflci^nt to enable the Court to render » correct judgment M^^i^^^Q^'^ ""** a case in which the Court ahould order a nW defflpHoit of the facia for the jury, with leave to the pwtiea t9i)«»n«r<r dtnom. Jfef. 39. / â VerdictâDamages.] Whereonaformer trial ihe jury af^arded the reapondent $3,000 damagea for the loea ^4ier huab^d, but tb» verdict waa aet aaide by the Supreme Court on tJ^e ground M miadiiecUon, and on the aecond trial the jury awarded $6,600 damagea: the amount waa not so ezoeaaive that the Court shouM aet aside the verdict and order a i/ew trii^l. C. P. R. Oo. A iJobtnwm, 118. V, VerdictâJury unable to an$u
Size: 1095px × 2281px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
