. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. -â â 4*. IIONTRBAL I^W REWIBTB. ,4 w* animaii which ihowi that th« public intere«t wwi not the o«i«.t B^K, ,uotiv« in writing thorn. On« of th« »rtiole«. which cu jeimpffi: UB^ th« term iticlu, wan <:ertainly iiyurioua. If th« Court Ourion. 0. Im^ow had thought proper to allow a Bmall aum aa nominal damaK«M, nay 120, wo would not have been di«poiHMl to change the judgment But no damagt* were prov.'d, and the Court Inflow, while charactenwng the expreaaions a« improper and iiyuriou
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. -â â 4*. IIONTRBAL I^W REWIBTB. ,4 w* animaii which ihowi that th« public intere«t wwi not the o«i«.t B^K, ,uotiv« in writing thorn. On« of th« »rtiole«. which cu jeimpffi: UB^ th« term iticlu, wan <:ertainly iiyurioua. If th« Court Ourion. 0. Im^ow had thought proper to allow a Bmall aum aa nominal damaK«M, nay 120, wo would not have been di«poiHMl to change the judgment But no damagt* were prov.'d, and the Court Inflow, while charactenwng the expreaaions a« improper and iiyurioui, held that the articlea were snbatantially tra», and dinmiuBed the action, each party paying his own co«tB. We think both parties should have accepted that judgment aa final. We agree with the (5ourt. below that the defendants used exprt-MionB which .were of an injurioua tendency, but we think the plaintitt" should have been satisfted with the judgipent by which he was relieved from costs. We confirm the judgment, but each party will have to pay his own costs in this Court as well as in the Court below. We also change the motif of the judgment which states that the articles were substantially true. ^* .⢠The judgment in, Appeal is as follows :â. â¢* La Oour, ' " Atteiiduque I'appelant, demandeuT en Cour de pre- mi6re instance, alldgue dans sa ddclaration que la d6fen. deresae-intimfee a pabli6 des articles diflfamatoitea et libe â leui k son adresse, dana les nutnfiros des % 8, 7 et 24 juil- let 1886. du journal publi6 par elle, k Montreal, sous le nom de " Le Monder et que la puUicatioj) de oes articles lui a oau86 des dommages considferablea; l; '⢠Attendu que I'intimfee a ni6 que les articles en ques- tion fussevt diffattiatoiresetlibelleux, et a plaid6, de plus, qu'ils avaient pour objet une matiere d'un intfirAt public; ' qu'ils^Ment fecrits de bona? foi,. qu'elle avait raison de croiro qu'ils fetaient vr
Size: 834px × 2995px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
