. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. i 6—oouvr or aVKXM'a bbncw. ^ .' 298 own linu of railw»f^ afUr tbty hsrn deliv«r«d tb«m OT«r to another railwtf jompsny, ill tho usual conrw^, for further conveyauue. VU§^ Aldridge v. '/%i« ft'/- WMtem Rjf. Co., 88 L J. 0. P. 161. and ^ C. B. N. a 682. alto Fhwt«$ V Ot Wetterm Ry. Co, 22 L. J. Bi., 76 lu ordor to ulaim oinniptiou and«r inoh a condition, it \ ia n«^c«iiiiarf to provH that thw gtxHla pawwd iut6 ih^ a>ui> "If l|yody of HomM othur railway company or oanrier: Vidn, Kant ^'^•fv.
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. i 6—oouvr or aVKXM'a bbncw. ^ .' 298 own linu of railw»f^ afUr tbty hsrn deliv«r«d tb«m OT«r to another railwtf jompsny, ill tho usual conrw^, for further conveyauue. VU§^ Aldridge v. '/%i« ft'/- WMtem Rjf. Co., 88 L J. 0. P. 161. and ^ C. B. N. a 682. alto Fhwt«$ V Ot Wetterm Ry. Co, 22 L. J. Bi., 76 lu ordor to ulaim oinniptiou and«r inoh a condition, it \ ia n«^c«iiiiarf to provH that thw gtxHla pawwd iut6 ih^ a>ui> "If l|yody of HomM othur railway company or oanrier: Vidn, Kant ^'^•fv. MidloM Ry. Cb^L. R. 10 Q. B. 1; 44 L J. Q. & It. 1 The«« name rojoi hav« been uphold by a Boriei of decitioni: in thiM country. Sou Torrance v. AUan, 6 L. 0 J., p. 190; v G. T. Ry., 17 L. C J., 1^26; Lioingilon^ v. O. T. Ry., 21 L. 0. J. 18; Cunningkam v. O. T. R»., 14 L 0. J., 107 : Pratt V. O. T fiyT, 1 li^g. News, 69; Robitehaud ?. a P. Ay., 8 Leg. News, 814; Dioiine v. C. P Ry, M. L. R, 1 8. 0. 168: Beaumont v. C. P. flp., M. JMEl., 6 8. 0. 266. ' • > • f '• In the preaent iuatanqe, the loss is proved to have occurred fM||an excepted risk, which was expntssly taken owner of the It is also proved that the goods were transferred by the appellants to the Utiott fr'Bladk River Ry. Oo., and they mast have been then in good condition, as the respondents' own agent inspeci«d them in New York on their arrival, and fonnd them to be so. If the above is a correct statement of the If^w, mo further proof is necessary. The conditions are on iha face of the bill oi ladinji^, and are also contained in tks shipping-note signed by the respondent himself. Thei* is therefore no necessity for the appellants to show anf farther knowledge on his part. ^ The learned judge |^m whose decision the presenf" appeal is taken 8eems''to have entirely misconceived the natare of the agreiement. He ignores entirely the shippihg note, and refer
Size: 3237px × 772px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
