. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. '.'â f A'^A'f' ^jfT Wf ^ -i-*, â¢âfioinrr or qoiimIi bknoh. -it^: ): ,1 > » ' du«, he maibtaifKxi ⢠dooHnatory etception, holding that th« matter wM of the r«tort of the Olrcnit Court. Oneofth« reMOMof th«Hearned Jadg« wm that by the ⢠to thw U«iK>r and LewS, Aci mJo by the «fith then, wm no longer any regulation specially applicble to action, in of lease when no lan^ was <l«mand.'d, and that it wa« ne. oewary in iinch .;a««fi to have r
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. '.'â f A'^A'f' ^jfT Wf ^ -i-*, â¢âfioinrr or qoiimIi bknoh. -it^: ): ,1 > » ' du«, he maibtaifKxi ⢠dooHnatory etception, holding that th« matter wM of the r«tort of the Olrcnit Court. Oneofth« reMOMof th«Hearned Jadg« wm that by the ⢠to thw U«iK>r and LewS, Aci mJo by the «fith then, wm no longer any regulation specially applicble to action, in of lease when no lan^ was <l«mand.'d, and that it wa« ne. oewary in iinch .;a««fi to have reconrae to tJie general dia- poaitionii of the Code of Civil Procedure. * / it doea not ned argument to establish that the Article fu t! ''"f^ «»^«" JnrisdrotiOtt over the present, cause to the Circuit Court. But the learned counsel ingei,iouaIy argues. "I might have brought this action without claim- ing any rent or damages. I might even now desist from such claim. Would not my action then be properly brought m the Superior Court ? That is, by asking less. the Saparior Court ha* jurisdiction, by asking more, the Circuit Co^rt has ; Bat thia action is dia- tmctlrmiilFlied by the reapondent for the Circuit Oourt. and ha cannot complain if tlTe Judge of the Superior Court treated it as it appeared before him without en- ' ?k"/ ?:^^*''* " ^""^^^ ^'^^^^ belonged if it were «>me- thing different. It is ^ar from the language of the amending Statute. 2^ Vict., c. 12. s. 1. that the Legislature had in view to protect tenants, great numbers of whom are verjyjoor., ftem the exorbitant costs incurred in Superior Court actions. There is no possible ambiguity irf the Article of ^h^. 0. P. above commented npon. nor can there be any doubt'^hat Art. 1624, C. C, throws this case ' under Arts. 887 and 888 of the ⬠C. P. f]!**n"*!'T^*^ *fe* â¢*â¢*««»?'»» m«»de in t
Size: 3802px × 657px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
