A Discourse of the everblessed Trinity in unity : with an examination of Dr Clarke's Scripture doctrine of the Trinity . R fenfe. 2^2 An ExmtnsLtion of Dr. ClarkeV fenfe^ as fubfifting in the Very God. See Chap, 14;p. 218. 5-. It does not otpp^arj that the WORD was fromthe beginning the Reveler of Gods Will to theWorld. That Office was^ in a great Meafure atleaftj difcharged by our Saviours preexiftent Hu-man Soul. See Chap. 7. Thus I underftand your N°6i67 617 ^^51^32^35-^58. Seec/:>.^di:.618J 6. Others alfo of your Texts relate, not to theWORD^ but to Chrifts preexiftent
A Discourse of the everblessed Trinity in unity : with an examination of Dr Clarke's Scripture doctrine of the Trinity . R fenfe. 2^2 An ExmtnsLtion of Dr. ClarkeV fenfe^ as fubfifting in the Very God. See Chap, 14;p. 218. 5-. It does not otpp^arj that the WORD was fromthe beginning the Reveler of Gods Will to theWorld. That Office was^ in a great Meafure atleaftj difcharged by our Saviours preexiftent Hu-man Soul. See Chap. 7. Thus I underftand your N°6i67 617 ^^51^32^35-^58. Seec/:>.^di:.618J 6. Others alfo of your Texts relate, not to theWORD^ but to Chrifts preexiftent Human Inftance^ touching N^6o7l (John 17. T. ^ ^ ( I .i5 John 17. 24. J > SsA£iJohn6.^S, ^V SS6\588J 1 John 6. <;i.\JJohn 6, 62, 7. 78 p. 87^ & & 8 107 88 107107 7. I have alfo largely fhewn, in the SeventhChapter^ that lvi° 6:;8. which is P/3 j—11. re-lates not to the WORDj but to Chrifts HumanNature. 8. So do diverfe other Texts here quoted byyou j particularly concerning N° 63 i^^.iS (2 Cor. 4. ^^Co/. I. 1J5 16.^J^r-^^He^. I. 3,& j^C^«^. 3. ^ 9. The Scripture Doclrine of the Trinity, 2^j 9. The fame mud be faiJ of N694. which isHeb, Compare what I have wruccn in Cha^, ^. p. lly&C. 10. As alio of N° ^6^, which is John i. iS. SeeChaf, 8. p. I20j 12 r. 11. There remain therefore but three of yourwhole Number, which relate to the WO R Dj orthe Divine Nature of the Son. The (irft is N 959. that is, John 1. i. whichproves thst the WORD is the Very God , and con-fequently not a diftind Being from him. See thei2thChapterj ^. 175-3 &c. To this may be reducd your fecond, viz,. is. Rev. 19. 13. Your third is N° 642. that is, CoL 1. 17, 18, 19,20. of which fee Chaf. 11. p. 164, 166,171. In fliort, the Apoftle there fpeaks partly ofChrifts Human Nature, and partly of the WORDor his Divine Nature. But in all that he lays ofthe Divine Nature, there is not the leafl: Shvido^vof Proof, that tis a diftind: Being fro
Size: 2430px × 1029px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., book, booksubjecttrinitycontroversialliteratureearlyworksto1800
