. Contributions from the Laboratory of Plant Genetics. . Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 6. Individual plant produced by an F2 segregate that was like Ar. Langs- dorffii in every detail (E of figure 4). Figure 7. Progeny row showing uniformity of F3 family to which the plant shown in figure 6 belonged. with lower means than will large individuals. As there are many indi- cations that the plants entering into this cross were very nearly true homozygotes I have endeavored to test this proposition. Of course, as might be expected by pro-Mendelians, in such a cross the variability of the F1 population is
. Contributions from the Laboratory of Plant Genetics. . Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 6. Individual plant produced by an F2 segregate that was like Ar. Langs- dorffii in every detail (E of figure 4). Figure 7. Progeny row showing uniformity of F3 family to which the plant shown in figure 6 belonged. with lower means than will large individuals. As there are many indi- cations that the plants entering into this cross were very nearly true homozygotes I have endeavored to test this proposition. Of course, as might be expected by pro-Mendelians, in such a cross the variability of the F1 population is so low that the extremes selected differed by only 8 mm. Nevertheless five F2 frequency distributions from different F1 parents are presented in table 3. The statistical constants shown in table 4 emphasize the fact that the means and the standard deviations Genetics 1: Jy 1916. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original Bussey Institution. Boston : [s. n. ]
Size: 1701px × 1468px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookpublisherbostonsn, bookyear1
