. The Architect & engineer of California and the Pacific Coast. Figure 3 80 The Architect and Engineer. strip should lap the prescribed amount at edges and ends over the pre-viously laid strip of the ply of which it was a part, but as this was mani-festly impracticable, the requirement was interpreted as applying to therelation of the joints in one ply to the joints in the ply beneath it, as .wasdoubtless intended; but, as stated above, the lap was reduced to 6 inches. The usual waterproofing practice of sticking each strip to its neighborby lapping at least 1 inch was followed in making up ea
. The Architect & engineer of California and the Pacific Coast. Figure 3 80 The Architect and Engineer. strip should lap the prescribed amount at edges and ends over the pre-viously laid strip of the ply of which it was a part, but as this was mani-festly impracticable, the requirement was interpreted as applying to therelation of the joints in one ply to the joints in the ply beneath it, as .wasdoubtless intended; but, as stated above, the lap was reduced to 6 inches. The usual waterproofing practice of sticking each strip to its neighborby lapping at least 1 inch was followed in making up each ply. The writerbelieves that a better result will be obtained, however, if this butt lap (socalled) be made 2 inches wide. The system of shingling adopted keeps the shingle at the headof the work with all six plies in evidence, and with all sheets securelystuck, as shown in Figure 1. Thus the waterproof sheet is entirely com-pleted back of the shingle lap, and may be covered and permanently pro-tected up to the lap. By this method there is little difficulty in obtainingthe correct number of plie
Size: 1712px × 1460px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, booksub, booksubjectarchitecture