. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. 62 The Florists^ Review April 2U, 1917. [advertisement] By Cable from Hillegom, Holland. April 22, 1917. My special offer with much reduced, exceptional low prices has been mailed to all the principal bulb im- porters in the United States. Do not order elsewhere before you have seen my prices. ANTHONY VAN DER SCHOOT, Formerly member of the dissolved firm of R. Van der Schoot & Son, Hillegom, Holland. In sales so diroctlv made, do not exist—the sellor is in likeliliood personally known to the pur- cliaser. Another objection unsuccessfully made a
. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. 62 The Florists^ Review April 2U, 1917. [advertisement] By Cable from Hillegom, Holland. April 22, 1917. My special offer with much reduced, exceptional low prices has been mailed to all the principal bulb im- porters in the United States. Do not order elsewhere before you have seen my prices. ANTHONY VAN DER SCHOOT, Formerly member of the dissolved firm of R. Van der Schoot & Son, Hillegom, Holland. In sales so diroctlv made, do not exist—the sellor is in likeliliood personally known to the pur- cliaser. Another objection unsuccessfully made against the law was that it in- validly interferes with interstate com- merce, by discriminating in favor of Tennessee-grown seeds. Overruling this objection, the court said: The thing sought to be regulated is the sales of seed which are made in this state. The sales of seeds that are the product of this state are, eauallv witli those produced in other states, within the provisions of the statute, except as To sales by farmers. • • • Tennessee^growu seeds are covered by its provisions when in like manner sold on the market; farmer-producers are within its operative force as to market sales, and any sale by such a one is to be treated iis a market sale unless it be consummated on his farm, and then for a restricted purpose. All m the same class are affected alike. * * We, therefore, hold that, if interstate commerce be affected at all, it is only by way of incident not directly, remotely, nor primarily, and that the main purpose of the act was to protect against fraud and harm, not directed against commerce between the states by way discrimination in favor of seeds produced in this state. It is conceded on the brief of appellees that the act is expressly limited to sales made after seed coming from other states is at rest within this state, and that it does not purport -to restrict sales of seed made from other states through in- terstate commerce. The Tennessee cou
Size: 1563px × 1598px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecad, booksubjectfloriculture, bookyear1912
