Second Chamber meeting because of the formal granting of the resignation status to the cabinet Den Uyl, after the fall of the coalition on the constitutional policy (Expropriation Act) Frans Andriessen Group chairmen (KVP) and Ed van Thijn (PvdA) in conversation during the debate Annotation: Debate following the fall of the cabinet Den Uyl (PvDA/ARP/KVP/PPR/D66). The government fell on 22 March about disagreement about the Expropriation Act (or fundamental policy), which had to counteract speculation with the price of land. In particular, KVP Minister Van Agt (Justice) thought the law went to
Second Chamber meeting because of the formal granting of the resignation status to the cabinet Den Uyl, after the fall of the coalition on the constitutional policy (Expropriation Act) Frans Andriessen Group chairmen (KVP) and Ed van Thijn (PvdA) in conversation during the debate Annotation: Debate following the fall of the cabinet Den Uyl (PvDA/ARP/KVP/PPR/D66). The government fell on 22 March about disagreement about the Expropriation Act (or fundamental policy), which had to counteract speculation with the price of land. In particular, KVP Minister Van Agt (Justice) thought the law went too far on reflection and withdrew his support for the cabinet. He was supported by the other KVP and ARP directors. Date: 30 March 1977 Location: The Hague, Zuid-Holland Keywords: parliamentary debates, parliamentarians, politics, government crises Personal name: Andriessen, Frans, Thijn, Ed van Institutioningsnaam: House
Size: 3246px × 2156px
Photo credit: © BNA Photographic / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords:
