. Selections from Leake's Elements of the law of contracts and Finch's cases on contracts . altero loco, ubi prohibitae sunt essent tradendse,jam non fieret condemnatio, quia repugnaret hoc juri et commodo rei-publicae quse merces prohibuit. Apply this in the same if the goods sold were to be delivered in England, where they areprohibited, the contract is void, and the buyer shall not be liable inan action for the price, because it would be an inconvenience andprejudice to the state if such an action could be maintained. The gist of the whole turns upon this; that the conclusive del


. Selections from Leake's Elements of the law of contracts and Finch's cases on contracts . altero loco, ubi prohibitae sunt essent tradendse,jam non fieret condemnatio, quia repugnaret hoc juri et commodo rei-publicae quse merces prohibuit. Apply this in the same if the goods sold were to be delivered in England, where they areprohibited, the contract is void, and the buyer shall not be liable inan action for the price, because it would be an inconvenience andprejudice to the state if such an action could be maintained. The gist of the whole turns upon this; that the conclusive delivery•was at Dunkirk. If the defendant had bespoke the tea at Dunkirk tobe sent into England at a certain price, and the plaintiff had under-taken to send it into England, or had had any concern in the runningit into England, he would have been an offender against the laws ofthis country. But upon the facts of the case, from the first to thelast, he clearly has offended against no law of England. Therefore,let the rule for a new trial be discharged. 27ie three other judges **-


Size: 1698px × 1472px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1890, bookpublis, booksubjectcontracts