Transactions . PERIVASCULITIS RETINAE Oliver: Perivasculitis Retinae. 267 Remarks. The case is interesting from both its subjectiveand its objective standpoints. SUBJECTIVE. 1. The nondistnrbance of the central negative is probably due to their faintness and their relative in-equalities in intensity; particularly when the best and the mostcomfortable binocular fusion could be obtained by throwing theleast injured, slightly excentric, part of the right retina into simul-taneous fixation with the relatively uninjured macular region ofthe left eye. 2. The nondisturbing qualities of
Transactions . PERIVASCULITIS RETINAE Oliver: Perivasculitis Retinae. 267 Remarks. The case is interesting from both its subjectiveand its objective standpoints. SUBJECTIVE. 1. The nondistnrbance of the central negative is probably due to their faintness and their relative in-equalities in intensity; particularly when the best and the mostcomfortable binocular fusion could be obtained by throwing theleast injured, slightly excentric, part of the right retina into simul-taneous fixation with the relatively uninjured macular region ofthe left eye. 2. The nondisturbing qualities of the two physiologic blindspots in spite of their necessarily marked increases in size. (Seefigures 2 and 3, showing the right and the left fields of vision forred.)*. Fig. 2. ^ *The other color fields (green, blue, and yellow), have not been in-cluded in this report, as they practically were the same was a slight subnormality in central color perception: a mere les-sening of degree of color saturation. 268 Oliver: PcrhascuJitis Retinae. LEFT
Size: 1545px × 1618px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1860, booksubjectophthalmology, bookye
