. Journal of anatomy. factors, all of which itwould be difficult to enumerate.^ But it seems that platycephaly is. Fig. 3.—Endocranial cast of Gorilla (Anatomie comparee. Museum dHistoirenatiirelle, Paris, No. A 8026). Left norma lateralis on which neopallialimpressions are neither clear nor precise. certainly to be considered as one cause, for we notice that, whereas inthe Gibbon, the most platycephalic among Anthropoid Apes, foldings areto be seen imprinted on the whole endocranial surface, in modern Manthey persist only at the base—by reason, probably, as previously said, ofthe force of gra
. Journal of anatomy. factors, all of which itwould be difficult to enumerate.^ But it seems that platycephaly is. Fig. 3.—Endocranial cast of Gorilla (Anatomie comparee. Museum dHistoirenatiirelle, Paris, No. A 8026). Left norma lateralis on which neopallialimpressions are neither clear nor precise. certainly to be considered as one cause, for we notice that, whereas inthe Gibbon, the most platycephalic among Anthropoid Apes, foldings areto be seen imprinted on the whole endocranial surface, in modern Manthey persist only at the base—by reason, probably, as previously said, ofthe force of gravity. In Neanderthalians, endocranial impressions ofthe furrows are more plainly perceivable, being usually apparent on thesurface of the frontal and occipital regions. The following figures clearl}-express the great platycephaly of the Neanderthalians compared withmodern men :— 1 Of. about that question, E. Anthony, Introd. k Ietude experimentale de la Morpho-genie, etc., Ball, el Mem. Soc. Anthrop. de Ports, 1903. 100 Professor M. Boule and Professor R. Anthony 1. Vertical longiUvdinal cranial index o
Size: 1890px × 1322px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1860, booksubjectanatomy, bookyear1867
