United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit . ore-holder and adapted to rest on the top of thecore, said weight having a laterally-projecting 8clug or member, as at O^ and a concavity asat 0 in its lower end, substantially as andfor the purpose set forth. G. In a core drill, the combination with aholder having undercut slot«, of bits or cut- 9<ters the sides whereof are milled or roughenedand wedges, substantially as set forth. In testimony whereof I sign this specifica-tion, in the presence of two witnesses, thisJ 1th day of May, 1S92. MOSES BEAL. : c. ii. dorkr,Ward Hoo
United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit . ore-holder and adapted to rest on the top of thecore, said weight having a laterally-projecting 8clug or member, as at O^ and a concavity asat 0 in its lower end, substantially as andfor the purpose set forth. G. In a core drill, the combination with aholder having undercut slot«, of bits or cut- 9<ters the sides whereof are milled or roughenedand wedges, substantially as set forth. In testimony whereof I sign this specifica-tion, in the presence of two witnesses, thisJ 1th day of May, 1S92. MOSES BEAL. : c. ii. dorkr,Ward Hoover. I49Q Arthur G, IVillard et al, vs. ? idii~ Seal 1895 Patent. [Endqrsed];,:^ Beal 543,227 M. BEAL (543,227)No. Alio A 118 Bi8)Eq. U. S. District Court,Southe^m District of California. Southern DivisionBeal 1895^ Patent FILED MAR 14 1917 WM. DYKE, Clerk By Leslie S. Colyer, Deputy ClerkB 118 / (No Model No. 543,227. .TTI CZH, Jariniis I^cfcjidaufs. 1491 2 Sheets —Sheet 1. M. CORE DRILLING MACHINERY. Patented July 23, INVENTOR. 1492 Arthur G. VVillard et al. vs. (No Model.) No. M. BEAL. CORE DRILLING MACHINERY. 2 Sheets—Sheet 2. Patented July 23, 1895.
Size: 1310px × 1907px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorunitedstatescourtofap, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910
