. The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy and nuclear medicine . Fig. 2. Anteroposterior View of Shaft of Femurtaken before first operation. Same as Fig. 3. Note outline of tumor in soft tissueand new bone formation in muscle. Fig. 3. Lateral View of Shaft of Femur takenBEFORE First Operation. Shows enlargement of bone; rarefaction; irregu-larity of outline of cortex; areas of new bone formationof periosteum extending into muscles; operativeVoundof bone, made by first surgeon in attendance. (a) The whole shaft of femur from neckto condyles was involved in the pathologi-cal proces
. The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy and nuclear medicine . Fig. 2. Anteroposterior View of Shaft of Femurtaken before first operation. Same as Fig. 3. Note outline of tumor in soft tissueand new bone formation in muscle. Fig. 3. Lateral View of Shaft of Femur takenBEFORE First Operation. Shows enlargement of bone; rarefaction; irregu-larity of outline of cortex; areas of new bone formationof periosteum extending into muscles; operativeVoundof bone, made by first surgeon in attendance. (a) The whole shaft of femur from neckto condyles was involved in the pathologi-cal process. (b) There was enlargement of the bonewith rarefaction and thinning of outer com-pact bone. (c) The rarefaction was not uniform;some areas more marked than others. (d) Contour of bone was irregular on allsurfaces. (e) At the middle of bone an area aboutthree inches long and involving one-thirdcircumference was shown where bone hadbeen removed by operation. (/) Along the shaft of bone, especially at site of previous operation, were numeroussmall projections of new bone ext
Size: 1085px × 2304px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidamericanjour, bookyear1906
