. The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy and nuclear medicine . Fig. 1. Lateral view, both feet. Notehypercalcificationof right scaphoid. phoids were much smaller than theyshould have been at his age in comparisonwith the growth of the other tarsal addition, the right scaphoid showed avery definite hyperealcification. The re-maining bones of both feet were of normalappearance, contour and calcium Fig. 2. Dorso-PIantar view, both feet. I might also mention the fact that the childhad a bilateral second degree flat foot. Going into this childs history verythoroug
. The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy and nuclear medicine . Fig. 1. Lateral view, both feet. Notehypercalcificationof right scaphoid. phoids were much smaller than theyshould have been at his age in comparisonwith the growth of the other tarsal addition, the right scaphoid showed avery definite hyperealcification. The re-maining bones of both feet were of normalappearance, contour and calcium Fig. 2. Dorso-PIantar view, both feet. I might also mention the fact that the childhad a bilateral second degree flat foot. Going into this childs history verythoroughly and carefully, I was unable toelicit that there had been any trauma,either direct or indirect. There was notuberculosis or syphilis in the family.
Size: 1773px × 1410px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthoramerican, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookyear1906
