. American bee journal. Bee culture; Bees. Feb. 2, 1905. THE AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL. 87 " The appointment of a committee on co-operation was objected to, and the president named a committee with the understanding- that it is a separate org-anization, and not a part of the Minnesota Bee-Keepers' ; The avowed objects of this committee were to investi- gate the subject of honey-prices, with a view to their better- ment by means of co-operation, and to obtain, if possible, a reduced scale of prices on apiarian requisites. At the proper time the chairman of the Co-operation Comm
. American bee journal. Bee culture; Bees. Feb. 2, 1905. THE AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL. 87 " The appointment of a committee on co-operation was objected to, and the president named a committee with the understanding- that it is a separate org-anization, and not a part of the Minnesota Bee-Keepers' ; The avowed objects of this committee were to investi- gate the subject of honey-prices, with a view to their better- ment by means of co-operation, and to obtain, if possible, a reduced scale of prices on apiarian requisites. At the proper time the chairman of the Co-operation Committee made his report, but the president ruled that, on the showing of the minutes read and approved, the commit- tee had no standing, and their report could not be heard. On this rule being^ objected to, it was sustained by a vote of the convention. Shortly after their appointment it seemed that the Co- operation Committee was being opposed, and in order to ascertain its status, the chairman wrote to the secretary of the Association, asking for a copy of the minutes of the 1903 meeting referring to the appointment of his committee. The secretary wrote as follows: "The only reference in the minutes of the annual meeting to the Committee on Co- operation appears to be the following : ' A connnittee on ?organization was appointed as follows '. Then follow the names and ; As there was thus a considerable difference between the actual minutes and those read at the present meeting, W. K. Ansell moved an amendment of the minutes to make them agree with the notes taken at the 1903 meeting. By arrangement, consideration of this motion was deferred till a later stage in the proceedings. Meantime, an amendment of Article II of the Constitu- tion, notice of which had been mailed to all members, was proposed by Mr. Ansell, and seconded by F. A. Gray. Arti- cle II says : " The object of this Association shall be the promotion of scientific bee-culture by forming a s
Size: 1515px × 1649px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1800, bookdecade1860, booksubjectbees, bookyear1861
