. Bonner zoologische Monographien. Zoology. 86. : Relation SIZE to upper tooth row: comparison between Brae hyp hyl la (+) and outgroup (?) Still, the lower gradient of the reduced major axis in Lonchophylla combined with a high correlation coefficient remains to be interpreted. Also here, an acute-angled geometry of the palate weakens proportional shifts in size alterations (, 62). Upper tooth row (OZR): Referring to the length of the postcanme tooth row in the upper jaw, the basic subfamilies BrachyphyUinae and Phyllonycterinae do not di
. Bonner zoologische Monographien. Zoology. 86. : Relation SIZE to upper tooth row: comparison between Brae hyp hyl la (+) and outgroup (?) Still, the lower gradient of the reduced major axis in Lonchophylla combined with a high correlation coefficient remains to be interpreted. Also here, an acute-angled geometry of the palate weakens proportional shifts in size alterations (, 62). Upper tooth row (OZR): Referring to the length of the postcanme tooth row in the upper jaw, the basic subfamilies BrachyphyUinae and Phyllonycterinae do not differ from the outgroup (cf. , 63). In size-dependent comparison of proportions, also the glossophagine genera Lichonycteris () and Leptonycteris (, 64) closely approach the allometric line characterizing the outgroup - despite a condition of higher specialization in other features, their maxillar tooth row does not exceed that of Carollia, PhyUostomiis, Brachyphylla, Erophylla and Phyllonycteris in length. Tlie reason is quite simple: in both genera, tliere are only two. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original Bonn, Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig
Size: 2183px × 1145px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookcollectionbiodiversity, booksubjectzoology
