An exposition of fallacies in the hypothesis of MrDarwin . Fig. 6.—Development of Simple —5, Egg in different stages. 6, Larva. (After Beneden.) In other w^ords, this larva. Fig. 6, represents theform of mans early progenitor among the let us see upon what basis this statement rests. In 1867 Kowalevsky published, in the Transactionsof the Imperial Academy of St. Petersburg, a paperdetailing his observations upon the larvae of severalascidians, more especially Pliallusia mammilatica as tothe early forms, and Ascidia intestinalis, a stalked THE ASCIDIAN LARVA. 315 spec
An exposition of fallacies in the hypothesis of MrDarwin . Fig. 6.—Development of Simple —5, Egg in different stages. 6, Larva. (After Beneden.) In other w^ords, this larva. Fig. 6, represents theform of mans early progenitor among the let us see upon what basis this statement rests. In 1867 Kowalevsky published, in the Transactionsof the Imperial Academy of St. Petersburg, a paperdetailing his observations upon the larvae of severalascidians, more especially Pliallusia mammilatica as tothe early forms, and Ascidia intestinalis, a stalked THE ASCIDIAN LARVA. 315 species, as to the metamorpliosis; and a very goodabstract of Kowalevskys observations is given, withillustrations, by Professor Michael Foster in the tenthvolume of the Quarterly Journal of MicroscopicalScience (1870), p. 59. To this paper is appended anote from Professor Kiipffer of Kiel to Professor MaxSchultz of Bonn, stating that he did not at firstbelieve Kowalevskys descriptions, but that during thesummer of 1869 he had made numerous researches,an
Size: 2910px × 859px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorbreechar, bookcentury1800, bookdecade1870, bookyear1872
