Elementary treatise on electric batteries . «! <1 <$ <j «3 3 d 3 3 3 3. 03 08 > x o3 tuO> to Sft o 3S tJOO 3 3si«3cjO« 3 MOOWOW fQ fi fi 3 23<U 3 S Mficc REMARKS UPON THE PRECEDING TABLES. It is seen that the Daniell battery may be superioror inferior to the volt, according to the proportions of themixture of sulphuric acid and water in which the zinc isimmersed. The conclusion to be drawn is that, for a certain com-position of this mixture, the electro-motive force of theDaniell is equal to the volt. Consequently, except forresearches requiring great precision, the English u
Elementary treatise on electric batteries . «! <1 <$ <j «3 3 d 3 3 3 3. 03 08 > x o3 tuO> to Sft o 3S tJOO 3 3si«3cjO« 3 MOOWOW fQ fi fi 3 23<U 3 S Mficc REMARKS UPON THE PRECEDING TABLES. It is seen that the Daniell battery may be superioror inferior to the volt, according to the proportions of themixture of sulphuric acid and water in which the zinc isimmersed. The conclusion to be drawn is that, for a certain com-position of this mixture, the electro-motive force of theDaniell is equal to the volt. Consequently, except forresearches requiring great precision, the English unit(volt) and the Daniell may be indifferently used. The figures given by different observers disagree, as isseen from the tables; these differences may arise fromvarious causes, of which the principal is, no doubt, thedifference of composition of the mixture in which thezinc is immersed. The table shows that the electro-motiveforces of DanielPs and Groves battery vary with the pro-portions of the mixture of sulphuric acid and water. Itseems as if there might be made a very
Size: 1976px × 1265px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1880, bookpublishernewyorkjwileysons
