Cases on the conflict of laws : selected from decisions of English and American courts . tion ofthe law of extraterritoriahty inconsistent with or repugnant to the ap-plication of the American law of domicile to American citizens resid-ing in countries with which the United States has treaties of extrater-ritoriality. Second: That Dr. Young J. Allen, having lived in China for a pe-riod of forty-seven years and having expressed his intention to live herepermanently, thereby acquired an extraterritorial domicile in China;consequently this court^in the administration of his estate will be guid-ed
Cases on the conflict of laws : selected from decisions of English and American courts . tion ofthe law of extraterritoriahty inconsistent with or repugnant to the ap-plication of the American law of domicile to American citizens resid-ing in countries with which the United States has treaties of extrater-ritoriality. Second: That Dr. Young J. Allen, having lived in China for a pe-riod of forty-seven years and having expressed his intention to live herepermanently, thereby acquired an extraterritorial domicile in China;consequently this court^in the administration of his estate will be guid-ed by the law which Congress has extended to Americans in common law.^^ 11 As to Aiiirlo-Inclian, Anglo-Turkish, and like domiciles, see Westlake, Law, 309^322. See, also, G. H. Huberich, Domicile in Countries GrantingExtraterritorial Privileges to Foreigners, 24 Law Quar. Rev. 440-448. For law governing acts in uncivilized countries, see Dicey, Conflict of —14 JIO GENERAL PROVISIONS. (Part 1 SECTION 2.—DOMICILE OF MARRIED TOWN OF WATERTOWN v. GREAVES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 1901. 112 Fed. 183, 50 C C. A. 172, 56 L. R. A. 865.) In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Districtof Massachusetts. Brown, District Judge.^- This writ of error is brought to reviewthe rulings of the Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts inan action of tort for the recovery of damages for injuries caused by adefective sidewalk. The first question to be considered is that of jurisdiction. Theplaintifif below sued as a citizen of Rhode Island. It_is_contend£d_j[Qrthe town that upon the,evidence the pjaintiff belovy was not ^xitizenof Rhode Isrand7 and that the_xourt_erred,in ,the-_instructians-_to thejury as to thg^fig^Tof ajQiarried womanj_deserted^by her husband,to establish an independent^domicile. That the plaintiff below went to Rhode Island before the date of thewrit, April 3, 1900, with th
Size: 1377px × 1815px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidcasesonconflicto00lore
