. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . Fig. Fig. 142. Fig. 141. Age of patient, twenty-one. A retained temporary upper cuspid. The arrow points toa dark line following along the side of the impacted cuspid. The impacted tooth itself cannot be 142. The same as Fig. 141, but taken at a different angle and showing the permanent cuspid. To verify or disprove my deductions another radiograph was made(Fig. 142), which shows the impacted cuspid clearly. The question arises naturally. What operative procedure should be 160 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY resorted to in such c
. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . Fig. Fig. 142. Fig. 141. Age of patient, twenty-one. A retained temporary upper cuspid. The arrow points toa dark line following along the side of the impacted cuspid. The impacted tooth itself cannot be 142. The same as Fig. 141, but taken at a different angle and showing the permanent cuspid. To verify or disprove my deductions another radiograph was made(Fig. 142), which shows the impacted cuspid clearly. The question arises naturally. What operative procedure should be 160 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY resorted to in such cases as the one just described? Had the patientbeen younger, or had the root of the temporary cuspid been much resorbed,or had the pressure of the impacted tooth been causing resorption ofthe permanent lateral root, or central root, or had the patient been suf-fering from neuralgia, periodic headaches, or any nervous disorder—had any of these conditions existed the temporary tooth should have beenextracted immediately, space made in the arch for the permanent tootha
Size: 1528px × 1635px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., book, bookauthorraperhowardriley, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910
