. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . Fig. 137. Fig- 138. Fig. 137. Two retained temporary cuspids, with the permanent cuspids impacted and malposed. (Radiograph by Lewis, of Chicago.) Fig. 138. Two retained temporary, lower, central incisors. No permanent centrals present. Age of patient, seventeen. (Radiograph by Blum, of New York City.) 139) after the development of which it was seen that the making of acrown was not indicated. From the appearance of the radiograph onemight suppose that the temporary tooth was loose—its roots being almostentirely resorbed. But such w
. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . Fig. 137. Fig- 138. Fig. 137. Two retained temporary cuspids, with the permanent cuspids impacted and malposed. (Radiograph by Lewis, of Chicago.) Fig. 138. Two retained temporary, lower, central incisors. No permanent centrals present. Age of patient, seventeen. (Radiograph by Blum, of New York City.) 139) after the development of which it was seen that the making of acrown was not indicated. From the appearance of the radiograph onemight suppose that the temporary tooth was loose—its roots being almostentirely resorbed. But such was not the case. Fig. 140 is a radiograph of the same case one month after theextraction of the temporary molar. Notice how rapidly the bicuspid iserupting into its place. The force of eruption, which had been held inabeyance for about eleven years, became promptly active upon removalof the abating object. Case—young man, age twenty-one. A retained,Tigs. 141 and 142. temporary, upper cuspid with no observable sign ofthe succedaneous cuspid. A radiograph
Size: 1421px × 1758px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., book, bookauthorraperhowardriley, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910
