Journal . avities. cations. SikesStrengths. Gilpins SpecificGravities. Sikcs Indi-citions. SikcsStrengths. Gilpins Specific SikesIndi-Gravities. 1 cations. 1 SikesStrengths. 3U •9005* 48-5 24*1 91847 oS-2 10-7 •93191 033 ?2 35 •89839 47*4 24-2 „ 91640 571 10*7 „ ?92986 64*2 Pniof. 40 •88617 46-2 ?24-2 „ •91428 66*0 10-7 ,. ?92783 &1 Proof. 43 ?89396 15*0 21*4 „ •912U 54*8 10*9 .. ?92570 C2^1 I>roof. 50 ?89174 43-7 24*5 „ •90;i97 53*7 W9 , ?»2;i58 01 ?o Proof. 53 ?88W5 42*3 2t*4 ., •9U768 52*3 109 „ ?92145 59*8 ?2 m •88720 41*3 24*4 ., •90i49 51-3 1IC9 ., . -91933 35-7 ?1


Journal . avities. cations. SikesStrengths. Gilpins SpecificGravities. Sikcs Indi-citions. SikcsStrengths. Gilpins Specific SikesIndi-Gravities. 1 cations. 1 SikesStrengths. 3U •9005* 48-5 24*1 91847 oS-2 10-7 •93191 033 ?2 35 •89839 47*4 24-2 „ 91640 571 10*7 „ ?92986 64*2 Pniof. 40 •88617 46-2 ?24-2 „ •91428 66*0 10-7 ,. ?92783 &1 Proof. 43 ?89396 15*0 21*4 „ •912U 54*8 10*9 .. ?92570 C2^1 I>roof. 50 ?89174 43-7 24*5 „ •90;i97 53*7 W9 , ?»2;i58 01 ?o Proof. 53 ?88W5 42*3 2t*4 ., •9U768 52*3 109 „ ?92145 59*8 ?2 m •88720 41*3 24*4 ., •90i49 51-3 1IC9 ., . -91933 35-7 ?1 .. IV, •88400 400 245 „ • 30*1 110 .. ?91715 57-5 ?2 ,. TO • 33*7 2»*5 „ 9010* 48*9 11-0 .. ?91433 1 5C^S i ;.. • 881)13 37-4 24*5 ,. •89872 47*6 11 0 ,. ?91270 53*1 .. SJ) ?87776 36-1 S4-5 „ •89639 46*3 . U^O . 1 ?91042 ^ 53^9 i 278 THE .TOURXAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHEMIOAL INDUSTRY. rApriiso, The resulting strengths, it will be observed, are inone or two of the samples jwactically uniform, andthese examples snfiieieutly estalilish the principleunderlying the construction of the tables; butwlion we come to examine more closely the otherexamples, we discover so many irregularities thatwe are justified in inferring that Sikcs did notl)roceed on any exact or scientific method, but wasIlmipelled to trust to experimental determiuatiouwitli an instrument notoriously unfitted for obtainingaccurate results, particularly in liciuids ajaproaching1 lie specific gravity of water. It will be observediin examination that some of these variations fromthe principle of the tables amount to 1 per cent.,and that, contrary to what we know to be thefacts of the case, the strengths are almost uniformlygreater at the higher than at the lower temperatiu-es,consequently their effect ?\\ill be to augment theiliscrepancies springing from the fundamental error(if the tables. We will now pass to the


Size: 2330px × 1072px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1880, booksubjectchemist, bookyear1882