. Relation between leading and the legibility of the printed page . These gave six series of 90 readings each, making anindividual total of 540 readings or a sum total of 1080 readingsfor all. The other three observers took part in the experimentxor distances 136 cm. and 1Y6 cm. They gave four series of 90readings each, making an individual total of 360/readings or a sumtotal of 1080 readings. The total number of readings lor theentire experiment was 2160. The readings, grouped to show thenuiiiber ior eacii distance, are as iollo7/s: 136 cm. — 900 readin.;^•s;176 cm. — 900 readings; 88cm, — 36
. Relation between leading and the legibility of the printed page . These gave six series of 90 readings each, making anindividual total of 540 readings or a sum total of 1080 readingsfor all. The other three observers took part in the experimentxor distances 136 cm. and 1Y6 cm. They gave four series of 90readings each, making an individual total of 360/readings or a sumtotal of 1080 readings. The total number of readings lor theentire experiment was 2160. The readings, grouped to show thenuiiiber ior eacii distance, are as iollo7/s: 136 cm. — 900 readin.;^•s;176 cm. — 900 readings; 88cm, — 360 readings. (d) Results. The factors considered in the results were read-ing times, the number etna character of objeclix^ely noted mistakes,the observerVsreports of his mistakes for each reading, intro-spective rcoorts talcen from time to time, and various notes andcomments upon the readings which the made throughout They were (PO , (B) , ( G) ,and Lii s se s D. Guthb e rt (G) , and Sluk e (P) .. of fHE ITY lUJNfMSrelationbetweenl00doew
Size: 1346px × 1857px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjecttheses, bookyear1917
