St Andrew's College Review, Christmas 1906 . e could walkover them. They did as expected in the first half by scoring 19to their opponents o, and, contrary to their expectations, theytrimmed Highfield at their own game, scoring 6 to Highfields i,Winans scoring the touch, Macpherson kicking the the whole game practically S. A. C. resorted to kicking,our halves being able to outpunt anything on Highfields back(H\isi()n. Officials: Referee, Glassco. Umpire, Gill. It might be noticed that the St. Andrews Seconds duringthe season scored 60 points, as against their opponents 6—c
St Andrew's College Review, Christmas 1906 . e could walkover them. They did as expected in the first half by scoring 19to their opponents o, and, contrary to their expectations, theytrimmed Highfield at their own game, scoring 6 to Highfields i,Winans scoring the touch, Macpherson kicking the the whole game practically S. A. C. resorted to kicking,our halves being able to outpunt anything on Highfields back(H\isi()n. Officials: Referee, Glassco. Umpire, Gill. It might be noticed that the St. Andrews Seconds duringthe season scored 60 points, as against their opponents 6—cer-tainlv a good score for only four games. AAith this material to draw from next year for the Firsts, have certainly never had better prospects for a BigFour championship. The line-up of the Second team for 06 was as follows: Full back, Macpherson (manager) ; halves. Grass, Ramsay,Hastings II.; quarter, Winans (captain): scrimmage. Hale,Fraser II., Miller: wings. Wood I., Chase, Fleming, Norris,Smith Irwin, Chestnut. 46 sr. ANDREWS COLLKGK REVIEW THE THIRD TEAM, IIM third football team had a most successful season thisyear under the able captaincy of Findlay, They playedhve matches, of which two were won, two lost and onetied. This indicates that this years team is one of thebest thirds the college has ever had. The season was commenced b\ a match with Harbord Col-legiate on the college grounds. The match was close andexciting, but within hve minutes of the end Harbord gained at(juch-down. changing their prospects from defeat into (who at this time was a third team man) played thestar game for College. The score was : Harbord 12. S. A. C. it. In the next match the team showed a marked difference intheir play, defeating Parkdale on their own grounds by thedecisive score of 27—o. Coppings kicking was a feature. The next was the longllooked-forward-to U. C. C. match,but the team was doomed to disappointment, for although everyma
Size: 1968px × 1270px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorstandrew, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookyear1906
