Transactions . ^ allowed binocular fusion and removed a medium gradeof manifest exophoria and a slight left superior hyperphoria forboth near and far, which had been previously corrected in meas-ure by a tilting of the head and a tiresome twist of the right eyethat had been empirically determined by the patient. One year ago, during my summer vacation, the patient wroteto me for re-examination of her refraction error; I have notheard from her since. i. PERIVASCULITIS RETINAE Oliver: Perivasculitis Retinae. 267 Remarks. The case is interesting from both its subjectiveand its objective standpoin
Transactions . ^ allowed binocular fusion and removed a medium gradeof manifest exophoria and a slight left superior hyperphoria forboth near and far, which had been previously corrected in meas-ure by a tilting of the head and a tiresome twist of the right eyethat had been empirically determined by the patient. One year ago, during my summer vacation, the patient wroteto me for re-examination of her refraction error; I have notheard from her since. i. PERIVASCULITIS RETINAE Oliver: Perivasculitis Retinae. 267 Remarks. The case is interesting from both its subjectiveand its objective standpoints. SUBJECTIVE. 1. The nondistnrbance of the central negative is probably due to their faintness and their relative in-equalities in intensity; particularly when the best and the mostcomfortable binocular fusion could be obtained by throwing theleast injured, slightly excentric, part of the right retina into simul-taneous fixation with the relatively uninjured macular region ofthe left eye. 2. The nondisturbing qualities of the two physiologic blindspots in spite of their necessarily marked increases in size. (Seefigures 2 and 3, showing the right and the left fields of vision forred.)*
Size: 1484px × 1684px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1860, booksubjectophthalmology, bookye
