. Joseph Guarnerius, his work and his master [Andreas Gisalberti] . resemblance to that of his master, the chief point ofdifference being its more upright posing. The largenessof the lower part, with the wing fully developed, almosttoo much so, is at once striking. HIS WORK AND HIS MASTER. *57 Letter C is interesting from the evident effort at in-dependence and improvement. The cutting is cleaner,the posing is still vertical, but the lover portion and wing. (this being narrower and further away from the lowestcurve) are lighter. The next, C2, belongs to a smaller violin ; it is of thesame type


. Joseph Guarnerius, his work and his master [Andreas Gisalberti] . resemblance to that of his master, the chief point ofdifference being its more upright posing. The largenessof the lower part, with the wing fully developed, almosttoo much so, is at once striking. HIS WORK AND HIS MASTER. *57 Letter C is interesting from the evident effort at in-dependence and improvement. The cutting is cleaner,the posing is still vertical, but the lover portion and wing. (this being narrower and further away from the lowestcurve) are lighter. The next, C2, belongs to a smaller violin ; it is of thesame type with but little modification in detail. There JOSEPH GUARNERIUS, is only a little more bend in the upper and lower D shows a striking departure, in almost allrespects, from the style hitherto favoured by him; so


Size: 1336px × 1870px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookpublishernewyorkcscribnerss