(The) historicity of the resurrection of Jesus . the words ofthe young m .n to the women were something in this order, He(Jesus) is not here, see the place where they laid Him, andthat such wa: later interpreted as the direction of an angelsvoice. Thus he concludes that it ?-s natural fr them tb! assert that they knew that the tomb was empty. Such a clev-er array of mi sunders tandin-ilis, however, is too brilliantlto prove worthy of the Lruth in this case. In regard to the third day, Professor Lcike thinkstiiat this was held from the beginning to be the day of re-surrection because of the exp
(The) historicity of the resurrection of Jesus . the words ofthe young m .n to the women were something in this order, He(Jesus) is not here, see the place where they laid Him, andthat such wa: later interpreted as the direction of an angelsvoice. Thus he concludes that it ?-s natural fr them tb! assert that they knew that the tomb was empty. Such a clev-er array of mi sunders tandin-ilis, however, is too brilliantlto prove worthy of the Lruth in this case. In regard to the third day, Professor Lcike thinkstiiat this was held from the beginning to be the day of re-surrection because of the experience of the women v/hich isconnected with it. To him it seems to be merely an in-ference. The prophecies of the Old Testa;:ient had an import-ant influence on this belief, though the references them-selves are of a doubtful character. Then, too, the propheOieEof Christ Himself are indicative Of this day. But this can beexplained away by those who hold that it is due largely, to theexplanation given by the early Church at the time of the ^. ;! 27. i| ii wretSg oT tHe Gospels. Such a radicJlT view finds sofflglittle support in the interpretation given in the Gosnelsto the long-looked-for Parousia. Mark b:10 and 32 givesome evidence that the disciples themselves looked for no suchresurrection of their Lord. It might seem that Jesus spoke toHis disciples about approaching death and ultimate victoryin terms which they were not ready to understand of these seeui to have been interpreted in one meaning ands me in another. Finally, -lie contemporary Tessianic beliefwith its traces of the third day has its place in this list. Professor Lakes final conclusions are such as arereadily acceptable by the earnest mind. He stilHlbelieves that there was an actual manifestation of Jesus JThere wa^ indeed no hallucination; the affair was actual and evenmiraculous, but not so in the physical sense. Paul was theearliest written source of the resurrection of Jesus. Thoughno
Size: 1390px × 1797px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1920, bookidthehistorici, bookyear1922
