. The Popular science monthly . NUMBER OF INHABITANTSPER SQUARE MILE I | L5SS THAN 2 [S3 2 TO O V/A 6 to 18 i to 4D £522 Ab TO 90 V&l OO AND OVER NUMBEB AND DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE BY STATES, 1910. THE PROGRESS OF SCIENCE 205. Per cent, op increase in total Population by States, 1900-1910. lated states, followed in order by NewJersey, Connecticut, New York, Penn-sylvania, Maryland, Ohio, Delaware andIllinois. The least density of popula-tion is in the mountain states, Nevadawith less than one inhabitant to thesquare mile ranking the lowest, fol-lowed by Wyoming and Arizona.
. The Popular science monthly . NUMBER OF INHABITANTSPER SQUARE MILE I | L5SS THAN 2 [S3 2 TO O V/A 6 to 18 i to 4D £522 Ab TO 90 V&l OO AND OVER NUMBEB AND DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE BY STATES, 1910. THE PROGRESS OF SCIENCE 205. Per cent, op increase in total Population by States, 1900-1910. lated states, followed in order by NewJersey, Connecticut, New York, Penn-sylvania, Maryland, Ohio, Delaware andIllinois. The least density of popula-tion is in the mountain states, Nevadawith less than one inhabitant to thesquare mile ranking the lowest, fol-lowed by Wyoming and Arizona. Thelargest percentages of increase areshown by the mountain and Pacificstates, Washington leading with an in-crease of 120 per cent., followed byOklahoma and Idaho. As has alreadybeen widely noted, Iowa shows an ac-tual decrease in population. The statesof Missouri and Indiana show verymoderate increases; the rural NewEngland states also show small in-creases of from four to seven per increase in New- York is 25 percent, and in Pennsylvania 22 per cent. The urban population, which includes jthose residing in cities of 2,500 inhab-itants or more, has increased 35 per jcent., and the rural population 11 percent., seven tenths of t
Size: 1967px × 1271px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, booksubjectscience, booksubjecttechnology, booky
