![](http://www.alamy.com/thumbs/6/518B9471-79D7-4431-B223-3479C9F6929A/2CEN7G6.jpg)
. [Records and briefs of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]. dated November 5, 1889, showing a Stationary Elevator or Hoist (Exh. 59, Tr. 620, copy 1104)Nicholson, No. 1,340,458, dated May 18, 1920, Portable Freight Stacking Elevator (Exh. 62, Tr. 632, copy 1114)French & Pavey, No. 1,360,917, dated Nov. 30, 1928, Elevating and Conveying Apparatus (Exh. 64, Tr. 644, copy 1122)Towson & Cochran, No. 1,337,804, dated Apr. 20, 1920, Industrial Truck (Exh. 66, Tr. 656, copy 1130)Cochran No. 1,260,145, dated Mar. 19, 1918, In-dustrial Truck (Exh. 68, Tr. 662, copy 1140)
. [Records and briefs of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]. dated November 5, 1889, showing a Stationary Elevator or Hoist (Exh. 59, Tr. 620, copy 1104)Nicholson, No. 1,340,458, dated May 18, 1920, Portable Freight Stacking Elevator (Exh. 62, Tr. 632, copy 1114)French & Pavey, No. 1,360,917, dated Nov. 30, 1928, Elevating and Conveying Apparatus (Exh. 64, Tr. 644, copy 1122)Towson & Cochran, No. 1,337,804, dated Apr. 20, 1920, Industrial Truck (Exh. 66, Tr. 656, copy 1130)Cochran No. 1,260,145, dated Mar. 19, 1918, In-dustrial Truck (Exh. 68, Tr. 662, copy 1140)Carr patent No. 1,407,124, dated Feb. 21, 1922, Elevator Truck (Exh. 69, Tr. 665, copy 1152). The defendants further introduced a working modelof the Dingee patent, (Exh. 61, Tr. 627), as illustratingin a general way the operation of the hoists described bythe last-mentioned patents. Drawings of the Dingee patent and of the Carr pat-ents, illustrating their operation are here given. XJ . 1 of Dingee patent Mo. ,dated November 5, 1889, Elevator,I DefntsExn. 59, Tr. 110/, ).. ] or Curr patent Ho. 1,407,12/,ebruary 21, 1922, Elevator Truck( Tr. 1154 )• Carr patent was cited by patent office( see list Defnts. Exh. 57 in Index to VolI of Tr., pace VIII-D. Platform All prior hoist patents are substan-tially alike in principle of operationwould not suggest building of lumber carr-ier. ( Grab, Defnts. witness, There is some testimony that thesehoists are different machines from straddlecarriers. ( Dist. Cts., Opin. Tr. 138 )
Size: 1286px × 1943px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1890, booksubjectlawreportsdigestsetc