. Electric railway journal . July 5, 1913.] ELECTRIC RAILWAY JOURNAL 13. 14 ELECTRIC RAILWAY JOURNAL Vol. XLII, No. r. servations were made during the morning and evening rushhours. The average time of observation was two days foreach combination of equipment per line. The largest num-ber of observations was made on the Central line, as thisline appeared to present the best field for purposes of com-parison. the rush hours. Considerable difficulty existed in fillingthe trains owing to their comparative novelty, and for thisreason the summaries include only those trips where theloads were in ex
. Electric railway journal . July 5, 1913.] ELECTRIC RAILWAY JOURNAL 13. 14 ELECTRIC RAILWAY JOURNAL Vol. XLII, No. r. servations were made during the morning and evening rushhours. The average time of observation was two days foreach combination of equipment per line. The largest num-ber of observations was made on the Central line, as thisline appeared to present the best field for purposes of com-parison. the rush hours. Considerable difficulty existed in fillingthe trains owing to their comparative novelty, and for thisreason the summaries include only those trips where theloads were in excess of forty passengers per car. RUNNING TIME One of the first questions in the consideration of train Table IV—South Okange Line Net Time Total Time Po wer Gained (+) Passengers Stopped in Consumption Delays or , Boarding v Seconds Stops Kw-hr Kw-hr Trip in Lost (—) in Along (Exc. of per per Car per Ton Remarks Mileage Minutes Minutes Terminal Line Delays) Mile Mile Mile Single Car: — 9 110 442 . + 4 48 235 No
Size: 1366px × 1828px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookpublishernewyorkmcgrawhillp
