An exposition of fallacies in the hypothesis of MrDarwin . akes an object-glass, he does so inreference to the objective—the lens. Instead of usinga clumsy tube of brass, with a glass at one end and anorifice, larger or smaller, covered with glass at theother, the bird carries its objectives in its own head,and just as it wishes to enlarge or diminish the field ofvision does it move the bones of the case in which itseye is enclosed. Cf, Yarrells British Birds, 4tli edition. Edited by ProfessorNewton, vol. i. p. 19. - 332 FALLACIES OF DARWINISM. And here is evidently a final effect produced by
An exposition of fallacies in the hypothesis of MrDarwin . akes an object-glass, he does so inreference to the objective—the lens. Instead of usinga clumsy tube of brass, with a glass at one end and anorifice, larger or smaller, covered with glass at theother, the bird carries its objectives in its own head,and just as it wishes to enlarge or diminish the field ofvision does it move the bones of the case in which itseye is enclosed. Cf, Yarrells British Birds, 4tli edition. Edited by ProfessorNewton, vol. i. p. 19. - 332 FALLACIES OF DARWINISM. And here is evidently a final effect produced by afinal cause. According to Mr. Darwins hypothesis,this addition to the eye of the bird is produced byvariation and inheritance. But what an absurditysuch a theory involves. We have a right to demanda raison ctetre. Did the birds eye vary pari-pasauwith its evolution from a lower form, and at the sametime did the bony case begin to be evolved by a smallspeck of bony tissue here, and another small speckthere, which caused the coming bird to be benefited,.
Size: 1984px × 1260px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorbreechar, bookcentury1800, bookdecade1870, bookyear1872
