. The street railway review . would havebeen hurt, and this company knowing that appealed tothe law for protection. If this little czar is turned loose he will proceed todestroy the property- which he tried to destroy when youbound him. The other side say, you can sue him fordamages. Why. sue John Beard for damages and hewouldnt have enough property to stuff a bluebird. Allknow that, who have ever had anything to do with himin a court of law. His books are not to be found whensent for by the court. To dissolve this injunction is toturn loose this irresponsible little mayor on this propertyand
. The street railway review . would havebeen hurt, and this company knowing that appealed tothe law for protection. If this little czar is turned loose he will proceed todestroy the property- which he tried to destroy when youbound him. The other side say, you can sue him fordamages. Why. sue John Beard for damages and hewouldnt have enough property to stuff a bluebird. Allknow that, who have ever had anything to do with himin a court of law. His books are not to be found whensent for by the court. To dissolve this injunction is toturn loose this irresponsible little mayor on this propertyand invite riot and bloodshed. Keep his hands tied untilthe next term of court in October, then you can hear thiswhole question; from that decision an appeal will lie, andthen it will be settled by the highest tribunal in this state,as it should be. Judge Bookwalters opinion was well taken and vigor-ous, and is as follows: On the 30th July the complainants presented this billto myself as one of the judges of the circuit court, in. \acation, and asked for a temporary injunction upon theallegations in the bill. The bill sets out at length therights claimed by the complainant to construct their elec-tric street railway in the city of Danville. It alleges thatthe complainants had gone on, under the provisions ofthe ordinance of the city and grant by it given, and hadin part constructed or was constructing its railway, andthat the defendants were threatening to destroy the rail-road and tear it up. A temporary injunction was granted at that time torestrain the defendants from destroying the property. It seems to me that the injunction was properly granted,that the court in the interest of peace and harmony andsafety of property, could not have done otherwise than tohave granted a temporary injunction. The wisdom and the justice of granting that injunc-tion is manifest by what immediately followed by theaction of the defendant; 150 men assembled and armed,and proceeded in the night time
Size: 1986px × 1258px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., book, bookcentury1800, bookdecade1890, booksubjectstreetrailroads
