. A Collection of tracts relating to the Deity, worship and satisfaction of the Lord Jesus Christ ... : to which is prefix'd a true narrative of the proceedings of the dissenting ministers of Dublin against the author ... that the Father, Son, and Sprit, arethat One God •, yet they differd widely in theirSenfe (which is their real Faith) and in theirExplications of the Do6lrine of the Trinity; andthat each fide efteems the Jrians, nay, Socinians,better than the other, as better Chriftians orwifer Men; but it had been very ftrange indeed,if thofe Men had refohed the Unity of the GodheadX 4 i^^
. A Collection of tracts relating to the Deity, worship and satisfaction of the Lord Jesus Christ ... : to which is prefix'd a true narrative of the proceedings of the dissenting ministers of Dublin against the author ... that the Father, Son, and Sprit, arethat One God •, yet they differd widely in theirSenfe (which is their real Faith) and in theirExplications of the Do6lrine of the Trinity; andthat each fide efteems the Jrians, nay, Socinians,better than the other, as better Chriftians orwifer Men; but it had been very ftrange indeed,if thofe Men had refohed the Unity of the GodheadX 4 i^^ 31 z POSTSCRIPT. into God the Father^ who held no Unity, but ofnree Gods^ if Three didind infinite Minds befijch ?, nnd if this be not fo, I wonder what is. But if Dr. Owen or Dr. Sherlock did it not, tismuch better if St. Paul., long before em, didthus refolve the Unity of the Godhead into Godthe Father, by faying Jo us (Chriftians) the7e ishut One God., even the Father^ and but one LordJefus Chrift, I Cor. 8. 6. And that One fupreme God, may confifl withOne fubordinate, is no jufb Difficulty to one whois for the Nicene Creed, God of Gods •, or for thatText, Heb, Thee, 8, 9. 0 God th^ God hath a-. T H E THE Trevious §iJJEST10N T O T H E Several Queftions about Valid andInvalid Baptism, Lay^Bap-T I s M, ifrc. confiderd, VIZ, Whether there be any Necejftty (even upon thePrinciples of Mr. WaWs Hillory ot Infant-Baptifm) for the continual life of Battifin amongthe Pofteritj of Baptized Chriftians? ^ Rom. II. 16. If the Root he Holy, foare the Brnotches, -fitfully appears, that Water-Baptifm was never intended hyGod, but either only^ or chiefly, for an Jntrodutlory or Plant-ing Ordinancey i. e. to attend the Go/pel for a time, at itsfirfi Reception by a People, until it Jhould get fome Rootingamong em, not for afiandtng Ordinance in one and the fameplace ; whereof good reafon might be given^ &c. fays Mr,John Goodwin. Water-Dipping no Footing for Church-Conununion, p,
Size: 1887px × 1324px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookdecade1710, booksubjectjesuschrist, booksubjectunitarianism
