. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . D due to the sinking ofthe Stowell wells w ith the portion dow to -he effect ofthe dry saaiions? A. I think with proper investigations I couldmake a pretty fair you reiaember s- testifying? A. I pn^suj-ie I did, and it sooras to me a very =;;ood ans^wer; ifthere was no ot -r evidoncj to the contrary I ^/ould be forcedto form t:at opinion. Q. Tlien you would b« Bur« that it was the dry Beacons? k, I mi^Jit
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . D due to the sinking ofthe Stowell wells w ith the portion dow to -he effect ofthe dry saaiions? A. I think with proper investigations I couldmake a pretty fair you reiaember s- testifying? A. I pn^suj-ie I did, and it sooras to me a very =;;ood ans^wer; ifthere was no ot -r evidoncj to the contrary I ^/ould be forcedto form t:at opinion. Q. Tlien you would b« Bur« that it was the dry Beacons? k, I mi^Jit be of that opinion without any further know-ledge. I could only give m opinion on the data presented i Before you teatxfied in the McFi-iorBon c ass you had benout over that couni^iy in t^e employ of * plaintiff in t canfor tJje puQioae of making investigations to aacortain whetherthe plaintiff tberein was affected by the operations of thepeople of ?;l«jj they v;ere complaining^? f^ . I made one trip over t at, on one day. Ti^iat is ray recoiiec-tion. Along w th ?rr. Schuyler and iir. Koebig and sorie othergentlemen. Q. Is t;iat tne only tx-ip you made?. ic>48 1 23 ?i 56789 10111213 B t I-S ? S 14 z = 5 a-^i 15 33 only trip, 0. Did you ^ivQ an opinion on the causes of t- e variousphenoiaena that have be n in tiiat section of thecountry by one da *s investi :ution? A. I wais not ^-iving opinions on iuy own mvedti/^ations. Iwas <:iving opinions on investigations made by others. Q. By others t- an yoiireelf? A. Yes, cir; there is no toctimony tere tlmt Bho\7s any factsteetified to by ae. Q, I bolievo in ti-u t c«.se the Cucaaonga W :«r Coiipany was a,/Rrty defoncant? A. I am not sure. Q. Ana the CucamoiM^a ^Yuit Land Ccmpany ?fas a party defendant,was it not? A. I tirn not sure how the def^nse ms divided up. Q. Wat oic you say wa-^ the obj ct of ycur investigationson tl at occasion? And to w at sections were they confined? A. My inebti^ations
Size: 1288px × 1941px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca
