. Of saving faith: that it is not only gradually, but specifically distinct from all common faith. The agreement of Richard Baxter with that very learned consenting adversary, that hath maintained my assertion by a pretended confutation in the end of Sarjeant Shephards book of Sincerity and hypocrisie. With the reasons of my dissent in some passages that came in on the by. Together with his addition to the seventh impression of The Saints everlasting rest .. . affirm that Hypocrites have commonGiace, even to the height expreflcd by you; butyou fay, It is not true Grace .Either its Grace or noG
. Of saving faith: that it is not only gradually, but specifically distinct from all common faith. The agreement of Richard Baxter with that very learned consenting adversary, that hath maintained my assertion by a pretended confutation in the end of Sarjeant Shephards book of Sincerity and hypocrisie. With the reasons of my dissent in some passages that came in on the by. Together with his addition to the seventh impression of The Saints everlasting rest .. . affirm that Hypocrites have commonGiace, even to the height expreflcd by you; butyou fay, It is not true Grace .Either its Grace or noGrace: if none, call it not common Grace,(or com-mon Faith, Defire, HopCj Love Joy* if it be none.)But if it be Grace, and not true Grace, then Ens cJ*P^eruw non convertuntttr* I maintain that itis not truefaving Grace, but yet true common Grace: Youmaintain in the general that it is not true Grace, andyet its truly common Grace: There being then noControverfie that I fee to be difputed between youand me, but whether£»x eJ* Ferftm convertuntur ^ Icrave pardon for my further filence, refolving ratherto give you the beft( though not to aJTcnt) than todifputeit: I remain A greatEfteemer of your Pietyand many .Labors, ^^fejjs^ Richard Baxter. Rqider, Ifuppofe thtt to have tht Book 4l hanJUfhich I hendeal with : and therefore have recited hut the fttm anifrincifalFajfages^andnot every ^ord; which thoH maiji read in the Bookitfilf. The ?J 1 The lECT. I. ThtOccafionefthU this friesMy conftntipg Adverfarj^to them that are lik^e to he ojendeA mth a pretend-ed difference where there is none. > • ^ScA. 2. Our Agreement: The fertinencfofwylropertinencies. Whether it Vfamot fomtfalfe Tranfcript of mj wordt^ that the learned Opponent ^aeput to confute ? The true Reafen of my words in the SaintsReft Vphichhe Writes againf, nith the mexning of them. Ofmj Improprieties and incongruities. The point feigned to hmine, ^hich I exprtfly wrote againfl , and
Size: 1596px × 1565px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., book, bookcentury1600, booksubjectfaith, booksubjectgracetheology
