Interior illumination of the University of Illinois auditorium . NEW DOME CHANDELIER 21. BALCONY CHANDELIER 22 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS At the time of this writing only the stage lightshave been changed. The results from this change have beenmore than satisfactory. The light on the stage floor ismuch better and more uniform than before, the intensity nowvarying from candlefeet in the worst position C, candlefeet near the front center of the stage, this beingthe position used most. Page 30 gives a comparative tableof the intensities before and after the change. It is seenthat the illumin
Interior illumination of the University of Illinois auditorium . NEW DOME CHANDELIER 21. BALCONY CHANDELIER 22 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS At the time of this writing only the stage lightshave been changed. The results from this change have beenmore than satisfactory. The light on the stage floor ismuch better and more uniform than before, the intensity nowvarying from candlefeet in the worst position C, candlefeet near the front center of the stage, this beingthe position used most. Page 30 gives a comparative tableof the intensities before and after the change. It is seenthat the illumination in the poorest parts is now betterthan in the best parts before the change was made as thereis now much more uniformity. Page 31 shows the differencein power consumption, there now being required only about40% of the power used before. The light is whiter and print can easily be read anywhere on the stage withouttiring the eyes, as the illumination is much more satisfact-ory and more pleasing. From any place in the seat area the unpleasantlight from the old fixture
Size: 960px × 2604px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjecttheses, bookyear1913
